17
Nov
09

Sachin Tendulkar. Nothing else

1999. It was a decade since his debut in international cricket. He had already become a global phenomenon. India had begun worshipping their national idol with spectacular unanimity — a rare feat by itself. The World Cup tournament was underway, the biggest cricket show on earth. There was mounting euphoria and breathless anticipation all around as India had returned to their ground of renowned conquest of 1983 – England. India was considered a dangerous threat to reigning champions Sri Lanka and looked a redoubtable claimant to the prestigious throne. But every match mattered especially at the qualifying stages. Then suddenly his father died. Sachin Tendulkar was all of 26.

What followed can be easily fathomed. The shocking heart-breaking disclosure. A long and lonely painful flight to India over 10 hours. Security checks and perfunctory procedures to be followed. A family reunion under emotionally draining circumstances. A widowed mother. Pain. Memories. A loss that can never be humanly compensated. But he returned. Another 10 hour long flight. A jet lag, may be. Words of consolation from team-mates. Media attention. Maybe another sleepless night five days in a row. But he was still back. Determined. Resolute. Passionately committed as ever.

We watched him in awe and admiration—virtually thunder-struck, bowled over by his incredible batting. His father’s s funeral was perhaps not behind him but still within. But he had summoned preternatural energies, invoked his own inner faith, found his fortitude. Sachin Tendulkar was at Bristol playing a key group match against Kenya. He went on to score a resplendent 140 not out (101 balls), and on reaching the century mark looked up at the skies, in a silent poignant conversation with his just departed father. Perhaps watching him from the heavens. It was a moment that no one who saw that match will ever forget, and even if you were to watch it now, it will bring a lump to your throat. I believe that knock at Bristol symbolizes Tendulkar. A fighter whose love for the game surpasses mortal comprehension. A team man to the ultimate conceivable core. Exceptionally tough from within, with a capacity to internalize adversity, not easily decipherable in that soft voice and chubby cheeks in a still boyish impression. Above all, a very proud Indian.

I am not going to reminisce his several illustrious great knocks and statistical achievements because they are already of legend and will be forever repeated but I do believe there are besides the Bristol knock two other instances that manifest the man Sachin Tendulkar more realistically. I thought his decision to resign from the Indian cricket captaincy has never been properly understood. Or appreciated. There were many who intensely criticised him for chickening out of what seemed as his next natural responsibility in and for Indian cricket. Tendulkar, however, did not think so. He did finally what his inner convictions told him. He had no false illusions. No delusions of grandeur. Leadership is beyond mere cricketing greatness and requires several other human traits to make for impact. His decision to quit captaincy reveals the ultimate test most human beings fail in — knowing oneself. They say knowing others is wisdom, knowing oneself is enlightenment. Tendulkar chose to play to his strengths, and despite the power, prestige and pride of leading India rejected the top job because he sincerely believed that he did not possess the mettle to take charge of a struggling, beleaguered Indian team requiring a different kind of dynamism at the helm. He would be happier contributing to an Indian win, after all, wasn’t that the real reason for playing cricket anyway? As it happened, India was to find a suitable skipper in his southpaw colleague Sourav Ganguly who would go on to become one of India’s greatest captains. I think we should also credit Tendulkar for letting that transition happen with dignified ease.

The controversial Multan Test match declaration against Pakistan saw for the first time an emotionally disturbed Sachin, taken perceptibly aback by the sudden decision by his long-standing team-mate and captain Rahul Dravid . He was 5 runs short of a truly hard-earned double hundred against an obdurate bellicose adversary in their own den. I think Sachin felt hugely let down as for the first time he publicly expressed his distressed reaction to the world. What bothered him was not that he had missed a personal career record perhaps but the unfortunate corollary that he was playing for personal milestones. He was grievously hurt. What Rahul and he talked in person will have to await their personal autobiographies, but I think it altered personal dynamics within the Indian team forever. It was a defining moment which revealed a visible streak of emotional vulnerability in the brilliant sportsman.

For any professional player in any sport , a physical injury is a horrendous nightmare, a psychological scar that can have serious consequences in their future career. It can destroy a susceptible mind. I remember a famous weekly magazine that had drawn an MRI scanned image of Sachin’s entire backbone on the cover with a story that headlined something akin to — “Is Sachin Tendulkar’s career over?” This was after the agonizing defeat by 12 runs against Pakistan in that literally back-breaking and traumatic Chepauk Test loss. Ten years later the man scores a hurricane 175 in 141 balls and runs faster than his 20 something non-strikers. I think the Hyderabad exhibition was to perhaps send a not so subtle message to a Yuvraj Singh & co that you never call a playing colleague with the mental toughness of raging bull – ‘Grandpa.’ Ever.

Tendulkar’s innumerable innings will be perennially cherished, but those who saw it say that his double century within a single day at CCI against Australia where Bombay won the match in three short days, mentally pulverized Shane Warne perpetually into a mango pulp. The Test series victory that followed seemed a logical progression. Almost all my friends only wanted the Sachin Tendulkar tee-shirt that he wore for us in the CricketNext.Com match in Dhaka in 2000. I frankly believe that he is one of the most credible outstanding actors in a television commercial — even as a brand ambassador his sincerity shows. After all these years, his first captain K Srikanth is still selecting him and erstwhile team-mate Kapil Dev has developed a healthy golf handicap. Tendulkar shares the dressing room with Ishant Sharma , almost half his age. Adaptability has been his characteristic hallmark. It shows.

I was on a flight with him many years ago and Tendulkar was on his way to attending a training camp in Chennai. As we walked from the flight to the arrival lounge I asked him what I think he has been asked a million times. “Just how do you handle the constant and increasing madness of insane public expectations, the distracting cacophony that accompanies you to the ground every time you walk in? The irrational belief that you must score a blazing hundred time after time.” His answer was brief and instant. “It is easy. Once you take guard, settle down and take your stance everything else recedes effortlessly into the background. Everything. Then it is just the bowler, his hand and the ball coming at you. Nothing else.”

In 1989 I was 28 years. Since then, to use a cliché, change has been a constant. I remember Rajiv Gandhi’s dimpled smile and earthy innocence in his handsome countenance. LK Advani’s rath-yatra and VP Singh’s caste card was to change India’ political future and electoral logic. Manmohan Singh’s breakthrough liberalization policy and partial devaluation would bring India into the global sphere, even as we watched Jimmy Connors make a dramatic run to the semi-finals of the US Open at the age of 39 on Star Sports, on a satellite channel. Dr Prannoy Roy dazzling us with The World This Week and Newstrack with Madhoo Trehan. Aamir Khan play the charming tapori act in Rangeela and Shah Rukh Khan winning a near-billion hearts with his inimitable romanticism in DDLJ . Mahesh Bhupathi and Leander Paes capturing grand slams. Harshad Mehta and Ketan Parekh , stock market booms and woeful scams. Kargil. A war. A nuclear test. Malls, multiplexes, mobile phones and MS Dhoni. Marathi manoos and Abhinav Bindra . A new India. A new tomorrow.

But somewhere quietly right behind them all, rising unobtrusively into the endless skyline above, towering away and beyond into the blue skies, that same young curly haired boy from Bandra. Sachin Tendulkar. Nothing else.

12
Nov
09

OM S(H)ANTI OM ! : Blaming It On Barkha

Om Santi Om, Nandita Ji ! I regretfully noted in yesterday’s publications that Nandita Puri seemed mighty peeved with NDTVs Barkha Dutt ( The Buck Stops Here) for having quizzed her on her famous actor husband’s sexual “uprising” ( pun unintended , although the revered Om Puri’s movies were usually always on such passionate social subjects in the turbulent seventies). Nandita is frankly being clever by one and a half, having the cake, the marzipan coat and eating it too. Sorry Maam , but who cooked the pot-pourri? Frankly, I watched with prodigious admiration how Barkha asked those “inner conscience” questions with such a straight face, while simultaneously imagining Bollywood’s latest tryst with all labels Maid in India. Maybe the BJP was ahead of it’s time when they went sloganeering India Shiney-ing .  Puri’s grouse that there is more to Om than the interview sounds flaky , fake and all fluff; after all, what did she expect from those graphic descriptions of adolescent Om’s discomfort with prickly heat? And by the way, even my hirsute counterpart Tarun Tejpal of Tehelka was evidently stunned by those admissions and must have seen his beard turn crimson as Ms Puri poured promiscuity out with panache.  One thing is for sure, most men will shiver in their pants ( please ignore that , folks) before marrying a journalist.

The slapping of the perpetual gad-fly Abu Azmi , the SP MLA in the Maharashtra Assembly by Raj Thackeray’s loyal goons led to some amusing exchanges and once again to Barkha’s credit, she displayed  remarkably equanimity. The MNS spokesman has the ultimate poker face not in sync with his belligerent outpourings. Essentially, if Azmi had been shot dead for insulting the vada-paav as well that day , Mr Patkar would have still said—“ He asked for it”. Sanjay Nirupam struggles with his past Shiv Sena lineage, and it shows . Amar Singh looked overall quite pleased with the publicity bonanza and would have probably not minded if Azmi had got a few more slaps. As for Bharat Dabholkar who has rumoredly some dangerous pets roaming wild in his office, he looked ready to pounce out of the screen.

On CNN-IBNs Face the Nation Sagarika Ghose had the standard mix on the Manu Sharma parole issue. The question on the parole issue that we need to find out is who was on the “pay-roll”??. Suhel Seth made solid sense on the nouveau-riche but isn’t that the inevitable new arrogant ostentatious face of Rising India? But the entire media deserves full credit for escalating the issue into a national embarrassment for all concerned violators of basic ethics. If I was Sheila Dikshit , I would stay miles away from such inane controversies.

Arnab Goswami ( Times Now) had the Yeddy-Reddy brothers Karnataka fracas thrown in but what intrigued me was the presence of corporate suited-booted types waxing ineloquent on political corruption and typical homilies in a manner fairly condescending .  Point noted, but these are the same Silicon Valley upstarts ( start-ups??) who voted the BJP to power and reinforced that faith in May 2009. Having been a commercial banker and asset fund manager before I can tell you that almost the majority of hyped companies in India fudge balance-sheets in broad day-light. Satyam is in august company actually. Even a mighty respected industrial house as the Tatas quickly struck a deal with Narendra Modi post-the West Bengal Nano or shall we say jumbo fiasco. Ethics??? And aren’t some of India’s biggest IT companies sitting on huge real estate property purely out of government charity in prime areas?  Sure, there is no denying that Karnataka is slipped dramatically on account of poor management but it is about time the executive class cut out their self-righteous bullshit.

12
Oct
09

The cost of greed: India exits

Before we hang the Men in Blue by their cropped locks (long curls and pony-tails seem passé for India’s young brigade) first, the fundamental flaw. And second, how TV ratings and the Big Boss attitude of BCCI and it’s incestuous sponsors ensured India’s abbreviated presence in the ICC Champions Trophy 2009.

The ICC Champions Trophy format for entering the semi-finals was inherently skewed. They tried the FIFA combination of making it into a mini-league tournament without even the basic comprehension that FIFA matches are all fully completed ones (even if a drawn result). That is what makes the final result of league winners beyond dispute and unnecessary conjecture. Thus, it is a “fair and just” league format. This is precisely where the ICC blundered big-time.

If we have just 2 groups of 4 teams each, every game becomes a virtual knock-out for an early loser or net run-rate based good-fortunes becomes germane. The prime pre-requisite is a “completed match” otherwise teams are subject to whimsical weather conditions depriving them of a fair competitive opportunity. Ideally, they should have made each team play the other twice to establish fair results (since only the Top 8 teams were playing anyway), but since the more lucrative T20 Champions League awaits instant inauguration in a few days, that luxurious benefit had to undergo an austerity measure. So there were no rest days which in reality should be mandatory for international tournaments. Thus, India got somewhat literally washed out of the Australian clash depriving them of any scope for resurrection. When you are already trailing behind, a drawn result is like kissing your sister.

The ICC could have just gone for a do-or-die knock-out tournament like in Kenya 2000, but hey, that would have been little moolah for the sponsoring TV channel as there would be barely 7 matches to telecast. With the ODI version awaiting some tough examination, the ICC failed in giving the tournament what it desperately required – a serious competitive edge. South Africa, India and Sri Lanka tumbled out for their generous contribution in the Joy of Giving week . And overall, almost expectedly the public reception remained as frozen as a margarita. Frankly, the tournament has been a woebegone flop-show.

The Indians were distinctly insipid against their traditional adversaries Pakistan, but the latter deserves maximum credit for mounting a determined effort. Even if for only a brief period till the next T20 World Cup, Pakistan is riding high on that unexpected triumph in England and is relishing the world champion tag. The consequent buoyant confidence is evident. Thus, our neighbors have broken their dismal jinx against us in ICC championships. We beat the Windies convincingly, Tendulkar batted just once, and the rain took care of the rest. We were left ruing the consequences of mounting hubris.

In short, India has basically paid an astronomical price for BCCI greed and sponsor’s arrogance. Let me ask you; why was India’s match scheduled for prime-time TV viewing on a Saturday, days after the tournament had commenced? Don’t other countries in similar time zones or better ones also have a right to their peak audience? Since South Africa has several cricket grounds, why was India’s match delayed for week-end viewing? Why was our second crucial match slotted within 48 hours on a national holiday of Dussehra on Monday? Isn’t that perhaps the real reason why there was no rest day, otherwise India would have ended up playing on three consecutive days? And finally, wasn’t that one unfinished game against the Oz perhaps ultimately responsible for our early elimination, making the West Indies match as inconsequential as a video-game?

The truth is that ICC has blatantly followed BCCI sponsor diktats , and schedules India’s games at sponsor friendly times even at the cost of manipulating standard operating procedures for international matches ( the annulment of buffer days). It is really ridiculous. The fact that a Sunday has became a rest -day before the final being held on a Monday is atrocious and ideally makes no business-sense. But you know what I suspect? There was a supercilious assumption that India would enter the semi-finals anyway ( week-end traffic) , and that is where the TRPs would be staggering. If they reached the finals, knowing the crazy Indian hysteria, even a Monday would not matter.

Just because we have global cricket’s ATM machines centralized in India, we are behaving as if have a natural birthright to world championships. As the last two tournaments have established, overseas cricketers are using our hospitable turf for both match practise , summer diversion and windfall earnings and moving on to play serious cricket in their home tournaments. What are we doing instead? We are going even beyond the IPL and creating city-based T20 corporate leagues, and soon a Sachin Tendulkar or MS Dhoni will also be playing for Dabur , DLF or Dharamsi Morarji Chemicals. We are making our international assets into club cricketers. Mukesh Ambani and Preity Zinta might soon decide India’s and ICCs Test calendar as well. It is time we lowered our foolish aspirations of winning major tournaments, as our obsession to constantly manipulate international cricket is boomeranging on our faces.

Last I heard, some team called Cobras were busy hissing around at practise on our desi-soil. . Champions or Losers League, I don’t quite care. I am not joking, but I seriously suffer from ophidiophobia.

12
Oct
09

Who is the goat? Ponting or Tendulkar?

One of the most astute moves made by a cricketer recently went largely unnoticed, as perhaps several felt that was a sulky over-reaction to a devastating emotional loss of the Ashes. And that too a catastrophic second time on the enemy’s well-laid battle-field. I am referring to Ricky Ponting’s (34) determined decision to quit T20 cricket to further lengthen principally his Test career, now in it’s testing last quarter. On the face of it, it looks professionally imprudent and commercially unwise, and evidently swimming against mounting tides. After all, we have had diametrically opposite reactions from the majority of cricketers, including Adam Gilchrist and Matt Hayden amongst others, who have preferred the pragmatic get-rich-quick-scheme of T20 over whatever remained of their Test and ODI careers. Then there were others like Shane Bond who switched sides to ICL with speed as fast as a bowling machine can capture, their national commitments and official records be damned. That is what makes Ponting’s decision, in my opinion, a tactically brilliant one, well-conceived, thoughtfully internalised. But most importantly, with a purpose.

Ponting has not explicitly admitted it publicly but the truth is that the Australian captain has deep down inside complete contempt for the meaningless travesty that is T20. It was amply manifested in the casual cavalier manner of the Aussies’ inglorious performance in the inaugural T20 World Cup in South Africa. It happens after you have scored more than 12,000 Test and 10,000 ODI runs, you do not quite feel the motivational urge to re-establish your towering credentials in another format, no matter the popular call or money imperatives. Sachin Tendulkar (36) like Ponting is equally foxed at the T20 marketing phenomenon benefiting from the irrational exuberance of TV ratings and excited administrators.

Sachin and Ponting are the world’s best classical Test players and ODI batsmen. Given a choice, Sachin will honestly prefer to be a gleeful spectator along with his family watching the Mumbai Indians in their evening entertainment sweat-out while munching popcorns. But unlike Ponting, he does not have much of a choice. I suspect the deadly trio of BCCI-IPL-Mumbai Indians will not let him go that easily and he is fully aware of that. Because if Sachin quits T20, expect a massive calamitous fall in TRP ratings across networks for a few seasons. Think valuations. This man is not just a cricketing genius, he is an awesome brand power, India’s national treasure.

Ponting and Tendulkar are separated by 20 months in age, 1,428 runs and four centuries in Tests, the only true barometer of international class, of genuine comparison of greats. The only kind of cricket that Sir Don Bradman, Len Hutton and Vivian Richards played. The difference between them based on pro-rata extrapolation is within striking distance for Ponting. In ODIs, Tendulkar is virtually as insurmountable as the Himalayan peaks.

True greatness lies in Test cricket and both Tendulkar and Ponting will give their right arm and elbow to go down as the ultimate greatest. And there are two undisputed measures for that; Test aggregate runs and centuries list; both manifest dominance, longevity and brilliance. Of course, on further investigation one will have to add match-winning knocks as well, but maybe we can discuss that some other time.

Ponting realises perhaps that he may have missed out on the media hype factor to Sachin, but the urge to overtake Tendulkar is high. Ponting can lay claim to having additionally shouldered responsibility for being a fairly successful skipper (barring the dismal Ashes loss 2009) and more importantly led Australia to two successive World Cup victories and even the elusive ICC Champions Trophy. Tendulkar abdicated captaincy, Ponting relished it and even vanquished his foes. But batting records will not capture those impressive leadership feats.

Maybe Ponting’s searing patriotic pride of retaining the masterful title of the modern Bradman on native home turf will give him that motivational prop. For Tendulkar, it will be about preserving that anointment through his customary grit and that insatiable hunger.

They are both undoubtedly great. But who will perhaps end as the greatest-of-all-time of our modern era is still subject to debate and maybe two years.

25
Sep
09

KIRSTEN’S “ TOOL-KIT”

WARNING: IF YOU DON”T HAVE A SENSE OF HUMOR, PLEASE STOP RIGHT NOW!

Sex has always been a very popular subject largely because it is so centrally located, I guess. Indian cricket coach Gary Kirtsen ably assisted by  one Paddy Upton  of course has tried hard to make a Peccadillo Circus of it , dazzling billboards standing erect from it’s towering frame. I am referring to the willful “leak” of his nocturnal plans for tired limbs, parched emotions, gnawing loneliness and severe depreciation of  prize assets of Indian cricketers . A  perfect tool-kit as it were. I won’t be surprised if that extraordinary exposition was circulated by Kirsten in hard cover as well, just in case his message failed to hit the bull’s eye . It could also be termed as fairly  user-friendly gesture from the team’s GPs ( Gary and Paddy).. .

When I first read Gary’s  patchily researched thesis on sexual tension affecting on-field performance of Indian players in screaming headlines in a normally conservative newspaper , I felt an unfathomable empathy for our bechara bachachas ( poor boys!)  in that wild country, cooped up in their dreary empty rooms watching their own muscular frames in large mirrors, in utter loneliness as their testosterone levels dipped towards the midnight hour. One also realized that we were into something not explicitly discussed in the more somber Fourth estate—the swinging libido of our paneer-paratha- swallowing stud-machines. It’s a corny issue. Or a horny one, whichever one you might choose. Either way, from the juicy instructions given out like a process note to undergrad chemistry students in their first day in the lab , it makes for some hilarious reading. It’s ticklish, for sure.

Firstly, since most of our chaps have attained puberty I hope , do they need the cricket coach to give them detailed sermons in fine print on basic raw instincts ? For heaven’s sake, I assume they hang out till choked by claustrophobia together, so can’t all this silly sex education be given as part of a chatty discourse? Now Kirsten reminds me of a local Chandni Chowk sexologist we used to get fascinated as kids to see in huge hoardings , who was India’s first official quack—he wore a massive turban and his moustache literally brushed his large ears. I also do confess to hearing some real salacious gossip about some celebrity Indian cricketers in Sri Lanka, the island nation clearly offering much more than just sand, sea breeze and salmons. So the truth is that Kirsten may be dealing with guys who are past-masters at figuring the mandatory work-out to boost sagging spirits to a T(estosterone).  .
I repeat unless Gary and Paddy  feel that our chaps are benign bozos ( and rest assured, some of them may be) you do not have to circulate such claptrap. Some of our guys are , I am assuming  happily married men with kids  , who the last time they may have been in another woman must have gone visiting the Statute of Liberty. I am sure GPs circulation will cause them with a lot to explain for their Man of the Match awards and those amazing records to their suspicious better-halves. The “Man” of the Match award may soon in any case become a misnomer. Everyone’s curiosity will be on that mysterious deserving woman responsible for those on-field pyrotechnics. .

My real objection is to Kirsten’s sloppy historical reference which manifests both factual inaccuracies and a trite explanation of the Indian national attitude. Sorry guys, but that was truly a lot of cock and bull crap.

As for MSD’s men , they will now with official approbation try their hand at sex  ( pun unintended) . Self-help has indeed been redefined.

02
Sep
09

My name is Shah Rukh Khan

This movie requires Adobe Flash for playback.

19
Aug
09

The Rise of the Middle-Class Superstar! – Shahid Kapur!

The Rise of the Middle-Class Superstar! - Shahid Kapur!

The Rise of the Middle-Class Superstar! - Shahid Kapur!

This movie requires Adobe Flash for playback.

11
Aug
09

SWINE FLU AND SHASTRI JI

SHASTRI JI PRANAM!

“Breaking News: The Prime Minister Manmohan Singh attends office in North Block.” ” Shah Rukh Khan goes for a shoot.” If you read such pieces of atrociousness on TV, you would probably have a nonplussed expression. How is an individual’s prime responsibility of such great importance that his mere visit to his professional headquarters or vocational location should generate so much unnecessary hullabaloo? Well, it happens in our world of Indian cricket.

Ravi Shastri  who now officially heads the National Cricket Academy , supposedly the tallest infrastructure of cricketer grooming in our country apparently made a much-hyped and haloed visit to Bangalore where NCA is located and suddenly that is the singular  news item of the day. Now logically, shouldn’t he be parked there for several months looking at amelioration of cricketing standards, selecting coaches, holding refreshers, instituting intra-academy tournaments, investing in mental conditioning , creating a talent pipeline, and touring the national interiors? Or is he merely a titular head ,  another one of BCCI’s magnanimous “settings” to ensure unfair PR coverage and have an in-house lobbyist? Your guess is better than mine.

Instead, Mr Shastri makes a royal visit a la-Prince Charles on a polo-field  and the NCA is supposed to bend low feeling  privileged to have his emperor’s presence. What a farce! Can someone please share the minutes of the transpired discussions and let the fans know just how many hours has Shastri spent there since assuming “charge” if you can call it that?

WADA-POW-WOW!

Every Mumbai newspaper has expectedly punned the WADA ( the World Anti-Doping Agency) with the city’s trademark native sidewalk favorite ” wada-paav”.  I was thus expecting some earthy words of profound wisdom from some of our famous ex-cricketers and some others on the doping controversy  who otherwise are ready to drop deliberate bomb-shells on celebrity cricketers , make pseudo-patriotic sanctimonious statements , write self-righteous columns and thereby sustain that ” appropriate image”. Funnily, they are right now eerily silent—No Comments! No one wants to upset Big Brother BCCI, you know. What happened, Sirs? At least, one constant nemesis of some  Bishen Singh Bedi has uttered simple axioms of life that our cricketers need to think about .

That is why I feel ex-cricketers will never make it to administrative positions of real responsibility; they are essentially pipsqueaks , chicken-hearted and have deep-rooted vested interests which is easily decipherable. One man who stands out amidst the shameless genuflecting in the chicken-farm is Dilip Vengsarkar. The Colonel is a stubborn rooster.

PAT THE CASH

I wish the ICC chief executive Haroon Logart had been more straightforward and clear in stating that he feared that slush cash would soon have cricket flushed with deep embarrassment of match-fixing if  systematic controls are not effectively established soon. The age of politically correct monotonous speeches is over, Mr Logart ( please refer to Silvio Berlusconi and Barack Obama , if you please). In his talk recently he was actually referring to the IPLs unbridled access to speed money  but he chose to behave like a shy bride instead,   relying on subtle innuendos , unlike a Rakhi Sawant grab till you brag style . It is like pointing fingers at the murderer from the witness box but refusing to call him so.  This is silly old-fashioned practise of diplomatic dumbness. I have been a huge critic of the Texan cowboy George Bush but I admired his shooting from the lip excesses  ” Wanted-Dead or Alive”. Logart could do with some time spent in Georgey’s summer-time ranch.

FROM ASHES TO ASHES

The Ashes have suddenly sprung to life after Australia’s rather insipid crumbles and drab collapses at Lord’s. Albeit England have looked sharper, it is clear that the mighty Oz, suffering from serious paroxysms of jittery pride looked acutely vulnerable. That they are back in contention is a tribute to their sheer obduracy to resist capitulation even in the face of inexorable adversity.

The final Test now marks the finishing line, and from the first ball expect a tough contest and a bitter do or die attitude even from the usually phlegmatic Brits.

In the meantime  I just saw some Breaking News which stated that our cricketers ( including Sachin Tendulkar ) have stated that they will refuse to do any tests if they are suspected to have swine flu as they do not want their privacy to be invaded. Such tests manifest a constitutional impropriety , added the BCCI President Shashank Manohar. Prof Ratnakar Shetty was speaking something about security et al when I switched channels.

05
Aug
09

Dopes and little chickens

The real reason that the BCCI is taking on the entire universe on the ‘Whereabouts’ issue of WADA ( World Anti-Doping Agency) is because they are dopes of the first order.

Sure, the demands by WADA are indeed exacting but if cricket needs a global endorsement it will, must and should adhere to quality standards. Some of the world’s leading athletic superstars including Olympic champions have come under it’s hawk-eye and have been found guilty of deliberate and willful violation.

Performance-enhancement drugs are a modern-day, big money, high media visibility reality; it is important that the surreptitious practise is checked early.

In fact, rumors have flown fast and furious about how the IPL is a perfect setting for drug abuse; continuous cricket, mindless travel, sponsor commitments and late-night partying they all cause both mental and physical debilitation.

The opposition to WADA’s stringent requirements are understandable but if you want to be a multi-millionaire stud with a Porsche, become a role model and adorn billboards, my friend, play by the rules.

Incidentally, it is such a pathetic sight to see Harbhajan Singh and MS Dhoni land up to gang-up against WADA by becoming the pawns of BCCI, but these little chickens had no time to pick up their Padama Vibhushan from the President of India!

The BCCI has stopped shocking me anymore as they are more dense than the Amazon rain-forests. You can easily fathom that these superannuated moss-gathering ancient minds have no understanding of the ramifications of unethical behavior in a highly commercialised and televised sport. They need to understand that the most important reason behind dope-testing is to create a level-playing field so as to ensure that a champion team or the gold medalist has done so without unfair competitive advantage. To argue against that is not just absurd but grossly disrespectful of both the opponents who subject themselves to the tests and the game itself.

The BCCI has dragged in security, privacy and the Indian Constitution into it. Let me take the Indian Constitution first and tell you that it is the BCCI which denies the Indian cricketers the basic fundamental right of free expression by gag orders, restrictions on writing articles and generally frightening the life out of them. Poor Yousuf Pathan has been virtually forced to withdraw his criticism of BCCI by issuing several denials on his brother Irfan Pathan’s controversial drop from the probables squad for the Champions Trophy.

It is a crying shame that the draconian Big Brother attitude of BCCI has not changed even after numerous hard lessons it can draw some learning from.

The privacy argument is a real joke. The Indian cricketers have become like celluloid stars, they just cannot survive without being amidst camera-lights. Thus, you have the new scenario where now cricketers themselves chase Page 3 hang-outs, reality TV and Bollywood conquests; I guess it enhances that “persona effect” and gives them better market valuation. They, in fact, have virtually sold their privacy to their sports agents for further trading gains.

Sure, security is a genuine concern, but almost all leading international sports stars have similar issues in various games; it is not just an Indian problem. The Sri Lankan cricketers are always vulnerable to terrorist organisations even outside of their own country, as are English and Australian cricketers in sensitive regions simply because of the colour of their skin.

Incidentally, WADA is professional enough to empathise with security and safety-related aspects and has it’s own confidentiality norms and ethical commitments to live up to. It is not a product of a banana-republic for heaven’s sake.

Ideally, the BCCI should sign-up (as have all the other teams) and then collaborate with different boards in cricket and with other sports federations such as FIFA, ATP etc to discuss genuine difficulties and player adjustments and then seek a mature dialogue with WADA. By unilaterally refusing to go with the ICC’s anti-doping agency, the BCCI is making a complete mockery of it’s administrative vision.

It has none perhaps, blinded as it is by its own delusions of invincible power and indestructible might.

For ICC this is the acid test (it has failed all so far being subsumed by India’s treasury operations), but if India refuses to sign-up they should bar India from playing in the Champions Trophy and any and all other international cricket till it follows the rules, without exception.

The arrogance of the BCCI harms India’s reputation in more ways than one.

In the meantime, can someone please provide BCCI with a ” performance-enhancement” drug please? The dopes will be in illustrious company.

03
Aug
09

SEX AAJ KAL

Movie Review : Love Aaj Kal

Stars:    2/5

Love Aaj Kal tries to be a cool, contemporary, cosmopolitan story meant for the so-called multiplex crowd ( those who are essentially tasteless, love over-eating on popcorns at unearthly hours, have assured jobs , wear 3/4ths and walk around as if the multiplex is their private baap-ka-ghar  and are constantly fidgeting with SMS messages which lighten up like night-flies every 3.27 minutes ).  Judging by the awkward response to some in-the-face sexually explicit digs made by Deepika Padukone to her middle-aged lover it is pretty obvious that this rather over-preachy and exaggerated love-tale has missed the point with it’s apparently niche audience. It has.

Firstly guys, let me tell you all movie critics ( not me, I go to see a Hindi film to enjoy principally it’s illogical absurdities) have gone over-board in giving this very sub-standard fare just too many stars and moons than it deserved. If a person is not talented enough to be a novelist, said Norman Mailer, not smart enough to be a lawyer , and his hands are too shaky to perform operations, he becomes a journalist. It is the residual remains from this lot who becomes a movie journalist. If you don’t believe me go read the reviews of one Taran Adarsh on www.BollywoodHungama.com who literally is the self-appointed marketing whiz for several productions ; his reviews appear before anyone else and his eulogies would even embarrass the producer himself. He does not merely write lengthy passages in pedestrian flattery of badly-made cinema but even predicts the box-office success of a film ( he gave Chake De just 2 stars and estimated it would be a colossal wash-out) . Anyway, I am sorry but I have started reviewing the movie critics themselves ( we shall do so at some other time) instead of Love Aaj Kal.

The film explores the dilemma of modern-day lovers; does sex have to necessarily lead to marriage etc etc ? Especially as several distractions with similar challenges are also groping around for quickie alternatives and are freely available at the drop of an underwear. The work-life thing only adds to the confusion and the heart-break.  According to Imtiaz Ali , sex in 2009 is like an economic theory where demand = supply. If you want to fornicate, you will get some and more depending upon whether you are like Saif Ali Khan or Deepika Padukone. Good luck!

Since this is Bollywood,  Imtiaz Ali ( whose Jab We Met was rather nice although it stood out in a year which saw mediocre woman-centric stories) must make sex take the back-seat and bring in the old world charm of the 1960s, where expressing lust was only for vagabonds and all you could do was to give each other coy looks , sidelong glances and sweet curd . No touchy-feely crap, no self-shooting on mobile/video voyeurism , no have-to-grab-you-on-first-date-pressures ; all that naughty stuff was only shaadi ke baad. Mercifully, although boringly predictable and an exact replica of DDLJ ( if you don’t know what that means , go watch an Akshay Kumar film as a punishment) at least this track is well-enacted. But the constant chatter between the age-old romantic ( Rishi Kapoor) and the insatiable Casanova gets pretty boring after a point. Too many words, no action.

What happens in the second – half post  the “  break-up” party  after both have found new soul or bed mates is unintentionally hilarious. Both their temporary appendages are treated like disposable adult diapers while the main couple dither and dance around like confused puppies chasing their own tails. The last 30 minutes is outrageously stupid  despite the fact that Ali apparently thinks he is pushing the envelope.  Instead he ends up pulverizing our senses.

Finally, true love triumphs over casual sex and live-in stuff. And everyone is all smiles.
Khan is good as a Sardar in love, but as the modern-day dude in ripped jeans and a roving eye he is just about as unbearable as Kareena Kapoor is in her interviews . Padukone is a leggy lass who shines in lighter moments but in the scenes demanding some serious tears and emotional churns  she is like an ice-cream, sweet but cold. Dooriyan which is really a fabulous romantic number strangely enough comes in the beginning instead of where it ideally should have been, in the end. The chemistry between the lead pair lacks physics,  biology and zoology.

As for Imtiaz Ali , at least he is different. Both his films have tried something new even if the novelty has not been the best experiment. There is always a third time.




Archives

Calendar

February 2010
M T W T F S S
« Nov    
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728

Categories

 

February 2010
M T W T F S S
« Nov    
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728

Flickr Photos

Eyes of the World

Madrid

i heart...

More Photos
Watch videos at Vodpod and other videos from this collection.

Sanjay Jha on Twitter

Heard That ?

A politician has a straightforward way of dodging issues.
More

Wisecrack of the Week

A Politician: he is full of promises that go in one year and out the other
More