Posts Tagged ‘Entertainment

18
Jun
09

BILLU BILLIONAIRE

Movie Rating: 4/5

Billu barber ( Irfan Khan) lives in the charming country-side of Bubuda, virtually penniless and without much hair left to cut. The reason behind his collapsing business is a new rival outfit , the rural avatar of Bombay Blunt , a modern salon , with revolving chairs, green-colored gels, electric trimmers , foreign shampoos and a “hairdresser” ( now please don’t protest, guys), who wears clothes which are as glaring as his sunglasses.

Billu’s two kids are on the verge of being thrown out of school, as the straight as a ramrod principled and semi-stubborn Billu refuses to cut edges for survival. Things look bleaker for Billu and family than the dark overcast clouds on the village skyline suggests. But there is a silver lining round the corner . Or is it?

India’s reigning superstar Sahir Khan ( Shah Rukh Khan) comes to shoot his futuristic techno-razz at the picturesque location. The starry-eyed yokels go crazy, the town is engulfed in irrational frenzy, and everyone wants to touch and feel the magical Khan; even feed him and give him a tub bath. It is hilarious, authentic and damn real. Khan manfully survives the ridiculous obsession and literal hero-worshipping, but the poor barber doesn’t.

The village goes into a tipsy drunken state when rumor mongers insist that the modest Billu in fact knows the celebrated hero as they were supposedly childhood friends. Overnight, Billu becomes the cherished one amongst the country-bumpkins. Bubuda buzzes with Billu bhayankar ( deadly Billu). But does the reigning King Khan really know the impoverished hair-cutter?

Billu’s kids suddenly get free education in the private school, and his disintegrating shop gets charitable donations of the entire modern day barber sales and operations kit. But the star-struck villagers want their pound of the super-hero, and Billu must deliver at least a handshake, a meal or a speech with his famous friend. Even wife Bindiya ( Lara Dutta) is gradually sucked up in the changing saga of Billu’s transformed existence.

But Billu does not just fail to deliver, he cannot even contact Sahir Khan, enveloped on all sides by Z level security , and a personal staff which guards him as the jewel of India.

As the enraged cheated villagers turn their ire on Billu, he is left isolated. The whole world thinks he is a crafty cheat, even his kids think he is just a phony. So does the audience.

In the ending sequence of the film, some home-truths tumble out. The superstar Khan gives an inspirational talk to the school-children before leaving the village for tinsel-town , and therein reveals the humble origins of his beginning. And that of a friend who changed his life.

Billu Barber is a simple story of a stubborn good man , living by his principles and penury. And self-respect. As Billu, Irfan Khan is first-rate, and by the end, will want you to have a trim under his expressive, watchful eyes. Great stuff! Lara Dutta, as his caring better half, touches just the right chords, even managing the rustic dialect with ease. The usual assortment of Priyadarshan characters loom large like a kebab platter , impregnating the movie with humour, spice and colourful diversity.

Shah Rukh Khan dances with three sexy sirens, to bring in Gen Y to the theatres. The Love Mera Hit Hit with Deepika Padukone is like a red hot chilly peppers sizzler. And Khudaya Khair lingers on as does Priyanka Chopra with her long legs.

As for SRK, for a seasoned star to play himself, it is pure cheesecake. He is indeed a rock star. But when the two Khans meet in the end, Billu Barber assumes incredible proportions of fine acting . The barber in fact emerges a rich soul with just a rupee in his pocket.

In the age of Dev D , what we need is a Billu B ..

18
Jun
09

EVERY DOG HAS HIS DAY

Movie Review: Slumdog Millionaire
Rating : 4.25

Who Wants To B A Millionaire? Perhaps most , but not Jamal, and therein lies the irony of Slumdog Millionaire. Jamal is on that quiz show only to locate his lost love, the bountiful Rs 20 million prize as meaningless to him as the inexplicable contempt with which his famous quiz –master host treats him. That is the triumph of the movie, and the human story behind it. The buzz, the fame, the cameras and the money for a boy who rises from desperate crumbs to graduate to being a tea-server in a BPO, hold no relevance. Nothing at all. He looks dazed and nonplussed by all the hullabaloo about his great win.

The fact that the protagonist and his brother are fortunate survivors from a riot-scarred Muslim family underscores the point that pain and agony, struggle and survival are not the prerogative of any one community; it cuts across religious and communal barriers. For those who saw the Mumbai riots of 1992 ( I did) , the truism of the devastation shows. As does the lives of those small faces telling us their hunger pangs as they sell the Mid-Day to us at Churchgate station. Have you ever wondered, where do they finally go to sleep? Who gives them a Crocin tablet when the viral fever rises? And do they ever drink filtered water? Just how does the occasional ten buck donation add up?

The growth of the two brothers into terribly contrasting characters, each rationalized by their circumstance and personality type is pure Salim-Javed ( Salim and Jamal??) and Bollywood masala. But where Danny Boyle scores is his ability to tell a story as is; not too much of overdone dialogues and a moral discourse , just the expression of anguish. Of loss. Of hope.

For Jamal, finding Latika is his only goal, and even as she becomes a gangster’s keep, he knows she must find her freedom. That one of the three musketeers must die is about redemption. And heroism. But it gives the tale a realistic poignant touch. In two hours we travel through the lives of three children, and leave numbed by their horrific experiences.

It took a British film-maker Sam Mendes to make the outstanding American Beauty, a look at suburban life in a modest middle-class home in America, torn apart by sheer vulnerabilities of daily grind and hidden complexities . Nobody grudged him the cinematic success. It won him Oscars, deservingly. Boyle paints an Indian story of spirit and spunk, of survival and strength. The slums are just a background. But they are real. And if you drive down Dharavi even today, the squalor and the stink, the muck and the Mercedes will still be there.

Where the film wins is in it’s universal appeal, which actually comes from the most basic human want; love. If you have found love even if you are in a doghouse , who wants to be a millionaire?

18
Jun
09

BOLLYWOOD’S UGLY NIGHT

Last night, one saw an unprecedented ugly spat between the so-called brotherhood of Bollywood fraternity on public display at the Star Screen Awards at MMRDA Grounds, Bandra. Frankly, the award show was rolling along fairly smoothly , with the hosts Sajid Khan ( Hey Baby) , Shreyas Talpade and Farah Khan ( choreographer and OSO director) doing their entertaining bit, with the standard scripted buffoonery and spontaneous digs at all and sundry. There were the usual impersonations of the Dostana homosexuality angle and the Fashion wardrobe malfunctions. In fact, it looked instinctive for most parts, and an engaging tongue-in-cheek affair, almost reminiscent of the hilarious Filmfare awards of last year hosted by Shah Rukh Khan and Saif Ali Khan, which was smart spoofiness at its sardonic best. At one point Sajid Khan even wondered aloud if Farah Khan was indeed a woman! The sister guffawed back-stage. Then suddenly Ashutosh Gowariker happened.

Gowariker’s modest commercial earner but critically acclaimed Jodhaa Akbar got the Best Film Award, and as the bulky director of Lagaan and Swades took center-stage , all verbal hell broke loose. Let me try and rephrase the conversation as close to what was probably uttered :

Gowariker: I am dismayed and disturbed by the ridiculous manner in which these award functions make fun of people like us who work in the industry. This is a solemn occasion to recognize talent and not to make jokes and poke fun. I look forward to these occasions and Sajid and Farah Khan are making a mockery of things.

Sajid ( interrupts): Ashu, this is an awards show, we have to entertain our live and TV audiences. This is fun, and we are only doing so in a lighter vein. See, everyone is laughing and enjoying themselves. I thought we are one big family.

Gowariker ( interrupts): What rubbish! We all work hard to make these films, only to be insulted by you guys? . Why were you hustling all when they were making their thank-you speeches, and then you jabber away to glory unrestrained? I wanted to hear the Marathi award winners make their small speeches too? .

Sajid ( interrupts): Ashu, we have instructions to keep the program going. We have to be brief, that is our mandate.

Gowariker: Shut up!

Sajid: Who are you to say shut up to me?

Gowariker: Shut up! I know this bit will be edited before it is aired on TV but you all are a shame and an embarrassment.

Sajid: We care for the only one true judge—- the audience. No one else can tell us what is right or wrong or to shut up.

Later, Amar Singh , Samajwadi Party MP who has a knack for landing up at all award shows with the Bachchan family, uses the platform to applaud Gowariker ‘s vocal outburst against the show hosts.

Sajid, Farah and Shreyas looked completely devastated and blown off by the vitriolic exchange as the entire junta and the Bollywood celebrities sat stunned at the nasty altercation. But Farah Khan added that she was not going to apologise for entertaining people the way they did as she had no hidden malice whatsoever.

In between, in the ultimate coup of sorts, India’s biggest ““state non-actor” Akshay Kumar received the popular award of Best Actor for Singh is Not King or something akin to that , which left him as stunned as the disbelieving audience. Then Kumar put on the biggest farce act seen since Mukri and Johny Walker in the 1960s movies ; in a somber voice he dedicated the award to———guess whom? Aamir Khan for Ghajini. Really? Such fake biraadri has never been seen before in India’s vicious ego-driven tinsel-town. Looking appropriately rehearsed, and with deliberate intent Kumar serenaded Aamir Khan throughout his affected speech even as he assiduously plugged his forthcoming Chandni Chowk into it as well. Very fishy stuff, and the Aamir Khan bit seemed hugely suspect. Then dramatically, he left the golden statue behind. That by itself looked like his best ” performance” to date.

The brother-sister duo of Sajid and Farah who were hopping around with great enthusiasm till the dramatic confrontation with Gowariker, were visibly shaken. The end was a huge anti-climax. In fact, the stars bolted out of sight even as the fire-crackers adorned the night sky.

My verdict: Farah Khan and Sajid do not just laugh at others, they laugh at themselves more. And that to me is a sign of people who have a sense of humour and are essentially well adjusted. Om Shanti Om was a reflection of that wild spirit. Even SRK laughed off that dog bit from Aamir Khan, which was in pathetic taste, I thought. In fact, he even takes jokes on his rumored sexuality with a cool indifferent stride.

Last night, Gowariker forgot that if Bollywood cannot learn to laugh at itself, it does not deserve to call itself an ” entertainment” industry yet. It is immature, hyper-sensitive , narcissistic, over-rated, and even its creative juices are perhaps just manufactured for public consumption, without any real convictions. In private ( and without taking away their professional expertise) , they are just small-time churlish sorts with a warped sense of self-importance ( who have been given exaggerated importance by the national media) , perversely ill-humored and lacking basic social graces .

Both Gowariker and Bollywood need to grow up. It will help if they watch a few Jim Carey films. Then imitate him in real life before plagiarizing it on the multiplex screen. That will be what a Momento!

18
Jun
09

ROAR OF THE BORE

Ghajani: Movie Review
Rating: I am still searching the bottom of the barrel

Three weeks after watching a tortured expression of a grim-faced Aamir Khan staring down at me with an intimidating stare from the billboards , all bulging triceps and tattoo marks all over, with loud proclamations of a monster hit with Rs 170 crores in the producers kitty, I ventured this week end to watch Ghajini with keen anticipation of wholesome entertainment. Three painful , excruciating hours later, I stepped out of the multiplex where even the wintry evening smog was welcome inhalation. It sure was a monstrous bore, a completely predictable dark film with an inane plot headed nowhere. In short, Ghajini is a technically polished , massively self-obsessed B-grade South Indian rasam masala –mix film, pretending to be a complex modern psychological thriller. What a gargantuan meltdown!

I am clueless to several irrational stupidities in the film;

  1. Since short-term memory loss happens to Aamir’s character every 15 minutes, how does he even know or remember the beginning of his whole mission? Shouldn’t then his start be on a completely new slate?
  2. How does he suddenly become a dangerous psychopath, with almost superhero strength? And pray, the tattoos on his body have no linkage to the movie? They are actually totally irrelevant to the script.
  3. How come no one has ever seen a single photo of the hot and happening telecom czar in a media infested world, when the man usually travels in a convoy of 4 Mercedes cars, has a huge private jet, a personal assistant running around with a wireless laptop, and publicly shops for strategic hoardings?
  4. The incongruous logic of keeping Aamir’s identity a secret becomes a yawning stretch, and lacks complete logic and common sense. It is beyond a point , an unbearable extension of one’s thinning patience.
  5. Who is this warped villain, who simultaneously runs a respectable pharma firm, is a day-light killer, donates charity money, runs a child prostitution racket, lives in a shady labrynth of lanes, and has six uncouth bodyguards resembling left-overs from the Lord of the Rings animals who are constantly armed with choppers, knives and sledgehammers. Whew! It is such pedestrian C-grade stuff, I could not believe I was watching the man from Lagaan, Taare Zameen Par and Rang De Basanti.

The film is a mindless orgy of senseless violence, meant to display that the 5ft 4 Aamir Khan can run like a crazed bull on a treadmill, make funny sounds when all tied up, and roar like a raging wild boar prior to being readied for a salami sandwich. It is pitiable cinema. Khan is a studied rehearsed actor , perhaps Ghajini is his way of redefining the phrase , a method in the madness. For Aamir, sadly this movie reflects that there is madness in his method as well. Asin over-acts to the point of exasperation, although in some scenes when she has restrained her facial muscle movements and over-done gesticulations, she is not as grating on your nerves. Jiah Khan is like screeching tyres on a slippery road, while Pradeep Rawat is as repugnant as cockroaches served as croutons in your cream tomato soup. AR Rahman’s music is surprisingly insipid.

If you have already seen the film, which I guess most have by reading the box-office numbers, I am sure it is thanks to the huge hype which Mr Khan relentlessly heaped on us a few days after the Mumbai 26/11 attacks. If you have not seen it, thank your lucky stars and avoid it as you would a common cold. As for buying the DVD of Ghajini, I would not recommend it at all. Imagine having to also see the deleted scenes of this exaggerated nonsense that is nothing but a huge monumental massacre of your sensibilities. And Aamir Khan now also giving you dirty looks from the personal confines of your own dear glass shelf.

18
Jun
09

WHAT WOMEN WANT?

RAB NE BANA DI JODI

Movie Review:

Rating: 4

“What do women really want?”

A confused, dapper-local Casanova with torn-washed jeans who wears glares even in Amritsari dusk , Shah Rukh Khan asks this of his dancing queen Anushkha Sharma. She turns philosophical and says that a woman wants a man to love her more than anything else in the world.

If Rab Ne has a sequel ( they should try that considering “Suri” is now becoming a cult figure) , hopefully they will find an answer to that age-old question that foxed even the great master Sigmund Freud himself.

Shah Rukh plays a bumbling fumbling customer service clerk in a public sector undertaking servicing phone calls. Surinder “Suri” Sahni is madly in love with his monotonous job, and answers his customers with remarkable enthusiasm which would give our 20 something /BPO types an inferiority complex. Tragedy is , that his heart beats wildly for his new bride married to him in typical Bollywood- formula circumstances. The father of the bride has a sudden heart-attack following the bridegroom’s accident; a double jeopardy. The modern-thinking young Miss Millie acquiesces to her father’s last wishes and marries the bespectacled, awkward looking, thoroughly smitten Suri.

Sharma though tell him point-blank that they will have a platonic relationship , and you do not blame her when you look at Suri’s contrasting concave shape to her more proportioned one. But Suri is in luck and in love but having never even touched a woman before, he is as confused and befuddled as a dog trying to comprehend Shakespeare. . With a little help from a spiked , orange-haired salon keeper Bobby Khosla ( Vinay Pathak in a brilliant cameo) with a dress sense more boisterous than his manners , Suri transforms into wannabe dancer so that he can become more hero like for his disillusioned wife, match her step by step, and win a dance reality show with her. And hopefully also her heart. Of course, Suri does so in a contrasting appearance, tight jeans that almost squeeze out his oranges, a skin-hugging Ulhasnagar produced Ed Hardy tees, and a macho walk with large pendulum swings left to right and back.

One of the coolest scenes in the movie is when Anushka gets into a verbal warfare with a grumpy rival, and SRK attempts to make peace, looking shell-shocked as the bitch word is uttered with insouciant comfort by his unsuspecting wife. The movie has some simple charming moments; SRK’s chat with his own mannequin, the sheer delight of receiving the packed tiffin, stuffing up on chicken biryani after a gol-gappa competition, and sharing his emotional graph with his best buddy, who is busy giving him cupid tricks.

Haule Haule and Dance pe Chance are well choreographed, and linger long. The parody of yesteryear heroes is average fare, and the title song is passable. The end credits are worth a delayed exit.

SRK carries the film with his usual hallmark style —-great body language, subtle expressions, and romantic eyes. He switches roles with effortless ease, making both the avatars become endearing . Anushka Sharma is a scene-stealer shining scene after scene with a pleasant presence in front of the camera for a first timer. And she does not let SRKs charm subdue her own chutzpah. It’s a top notch debut. Pathak is so good you want him to cut your receding hairline.

The movie has some silly flaws, but this is entertaining cinema , not a social commentary on marriage readjustments. Rab Ne is a simple story, simply told. I don’t think Aditya Chopra was attempting a master-piece. But Sharma and SRK through a vibrant yet understated chemistry tell us all that to make a jodi, you don’t need words. Just simple demonstrations of it. Some thoughtful action. Tender caring. And maybe even some dance.

So what does a woman really want? May be a man will have to become a woman to answer that foxy question. Because the truth is that sometimes women themselves do not know the answer. Suri does try though. Really hard. And with heartfelt sincerity. And for that alone, you must watch Rab Ne Bana Di Jodi.

18
Jun
09

DOST NA NA

Movie Review: Dostana

Rating: 2/5

Miami, in the sunshine state called Florida, is what you could call the city with all the tempting trappings. White sands, turquoise blue sea, swaying palm-trees, al fresco eating joints, fast cars, swank pubs, and wild partying. It is a city that symbolizes free spirit. Producer Karan Johar uses the perfect backdrop to bring to desi girl and boys of India, the still hushed whispers of a taboo subject—-homosexuality, in a commercial entertainer. Epitomising the hunky queens are Abhishek Bachchan ( playing the bahu) and John Abraham , bulging biceps, V-shaped contours and a tight ass in yellow underwear , the man on top. Playing the captivating , spoilt-sport is the full-mouthed, heavenly sculpted Priyanka Chopra, exuding the kind of sultry sexiness that could create a lesbian movement. Men have competition from all sexes, am sorry to report.

The lesser talked about the facile plot the better. Two marooned bachelors looking for a pad pretend to be gays , so that the land-lady feels secure that her niece Chopra will not have someone sneaking into her lingerie. Considering Chopra is in a continuous state of showing her divine possessions , it is not long either before the silly pretenders give up the grotesque tomfoolery and begin to play games to win her susceptible heart instead. The problem is that there is the standard hurdles, and last-minute glitches. Including a boring intrusion in the form of a single parent essayed with languid listlessness by Bobby Deol. The moment Deol makes a grand spectacle of himself as the fourth angle to the expected script , with an irritating kid in tow, the movie nosedives. The tragedy for Dostana is that Deol comes in just before the interval. Worse, he stays till the end, appearing in intermittent intervals with a blank smile and a lovelorn look , a face and body language that could do with some zingy vibrancy. .

Bachchan’s “ fairy-tale” ( pun and fun intended) concoction about the Venice love-story with John is truly creative. As is the sensitive subtlety when Bachchan deftly lets his emotions roll in a photo album, while John takes his secret object of affection to a private viewing of Kuch Kuch Hota Hai in a park. It is in these tender moments that Dostana shows that besides the groin and loin jokes, it has a heart as well.

There are the usual jokers in the pack; Boman Irani , as Chopra’s gay boss with a penchant for instant gratification is hilarious. Kiron Kher does a wholesome repeat of the hysterical OSO mom-act who must accept that her son loves driving in reverse gear and loves a bum deal.

Dostana is a two-in-one film ( pun intended); pre-interval, you love the general cacophony, the growing friendship between young buddies, the goofy jokes, the songs. Director Tarun Mansukhani is in his Miami shorts up to this point. The second half is a complete let-down, which even a “ drag” queen would not approve of. It is not just a small fall, it is an Amazonian drop. Pity!

Shilpa Shetty , Incredible India’s tourist destination for must-see long legs, gives Dostana just the kind of cool, casual start you are looking for as a hot item. The songs are catchy and while Jaane Tu is deliciously infectious and Desi girl is rollicking, it is Kabhar Nahi , with it’s lovely lyrics , great beat and background hum that will have you bowled over.

What works for Dostana is Bachchan and Abraham letting it go and enjoying themselves, albeit they do look an odd couple. Priyanka Chopra plays herself in those sexy shorts and short tees , the golden swim-suit and glowing expressions adding spice to her caramel tan . The much dramatized smooch scene between the brawn and the prawn in the end is so ridiculously forced, it makes you cringe. For a mainstream film attempting juvenile humour about gay behavior that should actually have been a high point; we should have been tongue-tied with amazement. Instead it as flat as kissing your sister perhaps.

At the end , when Chopra chooses the cheesy sentimental nerd Deol as her knight in shiny Armani , you are tempted to empathise with Bachchan and Abraham with the 1970s favorite, “ Usme kya hai jo mujh me nahi hai”. Really!

Watch it if you must. The DVD is recommended though, because at least there you can watch only the first half and replay it. And then, of course, there is Priyanka Chopra. Homosexuality may be out of the closet, but Chopra is worth keeping in your own private collection.

18
Jun
09

“BOND”-ING WITH THE WORST

Movie Review: Quantum of Solace: James Bond

Rating: 1.5/5

I am a generation that grew up watching movies in Air Cool theatres ( AC was a super-luxury in just a select few theatres ). Hollywood movies would release in India at least two to three years after it’s LA premiere , and there would be such bizarre censor edits, you would see a woman taking her clothes off and on in a blink. It was , I believe, the fastest expression of the “ quickie” in our times.

James Bond, immortalized by a dapper, charmingly rugged and highly suave Sean Connery in Dr No, Thunderball, Goldfinger, Never Say Never again et al, and by the wicked humour and disarming bravado of Roger Moore in Live and Let Die, The Man with the Golden Gun, A View To a Kill, Octopussy made for an absorbing, entertaining watch. We would wait for two and a half year intervals in breathless anticipation for Bond to take us to great locales, stunning women with their sensual pouts, and a maverick villain with a sinister plan for global destruction. It was always worth the wait. Yesterday, as I watched Quantum of Solace, I could not believe it that I was furiously checking my wrist watch , awaiting the end credits. It was sacrilege for a die-hard Bond fan.

Firstly, I think calling a James Bond film by a strange 1900s English family drama title, Quantum of Solace, was a terrible naming blunder. Almost everybody I know kept asking me about just what did the darn sentimental thing have to do with the slick, fast-paced existence of the British secret service agent. Search me folks, but if this was meant to showcase Bond’s emotional vulnerabilities after losing his last bed mate in Casino Royale, it sounded grotesque to say the least.

The new director, in an attempt to perhaps redefine the modern-day Bond, has committed a clear blasphemy. The film has done away with the classic background score, and the great bended knee shoot —- the hallmark of Bond at the very beginning . Even the title digital graphics and the theme song are not a patch on earlier inventiveness. Daniel Craig seems strictly adhering to No sex, we are British conduct. There is no salacious seduction, no alluring deceit, no build-up of sexual tension, the women looking remarkably insipid, despite toned bodies and pouting mouths. Oh , so sad! I hope Bond will not end up being George Michael.

The best Bond films had a genius eccentric villain, usually supported by a dangerous iconic bodyguard who protected his evil designs with religious devotion ; remember, that deadly Japanese midget in the Golden gun? He was a masterpiece in deception. This one has a French bread as a villain, and no sidekicks excepting for an overweight buffoon in cohorts. And his supposed Machiavellian mission of hoarding water seems a far-fetched issue , not really sounding consumable, despite the threat of dry-taps. He could as well have been an Indian real estate broker looking to buy cheap land in Bolivia by bribing corrupt government officials. It is a flimsy storyline, as flaky as the croissant served on Jet Airways.

The movie has a plastic plot which is just an excuse to show a poor decrepit Bolivia and Haiti in all their sordid poverty, I guess, to appeal to western audiences in Trafalgar Square so that they can say—Oh , my God! Long live the Queen!

From the unexplained mindless car-chase in the first scene to the sudden abrupt end, Daniel Craig looks so seriously intense and almost desperately grave, you wonder if he is dressed up in black suits as a perpetual stand-by to attend a formal funeral. This Bond is a brooding fellow in a state of inner turmoil , totally humorless and self-centred, the sheer boredom of which he inflicts on us with immaculate precision. And in his one bare-chested scene, he looks soft enough to be on the receiving end ( pun intended)of John Abraham’s macho six-packs if the latter really has any gay propensities. Craig is all blue eyes and facially expressionless as they come. He also happily kills at random ( more bloodshed than his predecessors) , never once faces a broken bone or even a brief capture ( which was vintage Bond), and thus deprives the movie of any thrill as he does not ever need an escape route. It is just such a shoddy predictable script. It is tragic to see the Americanisation of Bond , as he resembles a Vin Diesel clone.

And let me tell you, the scene where he drops off the plane in mid-air is not a patch on Farhan Akhtar’s Don where SRK did the same stunt with greater panache. Judi Dench as M is as flat as the pancake make-up on her pizza-round face, the one-liners bereft of any real cackle. There was not one intelligible joke in the film. No surprises. Bond has even dispensed with his celebrated “ gadget-laboratory “ where he usually encountered his life-saviours. But of course, now he does not need one.

Save your money, this movie is a brilliant bore and deserves our complete condescension or maybe as the Queen would like it, a royal rebuff. Something tells me that the Bond franchise is running out of creative ideas. And juice. Maybe they will call their next film, “The Resuscitation of Paradigm in Absolution”.

Golmaal may return. I hope James Bond does not.

18
Jun
09

MAKING A STATEMENT

Movie Review: Fashion

4/5

The world of glitzy fashion, sexy ramp walks, endless flash bulbs, late-night parties , brand endorsements, Page 3 celebrity status, Bollywood dreams ; producer-director Madhur Bhandarkar is fully aware of what draws the Chandigarh-born, hugely determined, middle-class local beauty-contest winner Meghana Mathur ( Priyanka Chopra) to the big bad rat-infested world of greedy Mumbai chasing cash bundles in a cosmetic avatar. Chopra is an intrinsically simple girl , but certainly not stupidly naïve, and makes up for her relative inexperience of air-kissing with oodles of country-made gumption and charming chutzpah. She has , as her casting agent says, the right mix of attitude and confidence to make it big. She does. But at what cost? That is precisely what Bhandarkar unravels over 2 hrs 40 minutes of compelling watching.

There are some real-life vignettes punctuating the behind-the-scenes madness. Kangana Ranaut ( inspired by the tragic Geetanjali Nagpal case) the reigning princess, inhales coke and cigarette fumes moments before swaying confidently down the red catwalk as the show-stopper. Fashion designers hawk Bangkok street apparel as their own creative contributions, even as the starry-eyed young things swallow humiliation from insufferable gay fashion icons. There is free casual sex , implicitly understood and quietly recognized, before they are dumped like disposable diapers. No chains attached. It is a quid pro quo universe, for a thin as thread survival. Chopra walks in to a ready-made steely world of warped ambitions, quite oblivious that big-time modeling calls for some rather queer compromises.

Ranaut , the numero uno model is sexually exploited and her vulnerabilities misused by watchful eyes and a dangerous lover. Chopra master-minds her smart moves astutely and overnight becomes the sensational new-find, and walks straight into a swank sea-facing apartment and the arms of the much-married industry hot-shot Arbaaz Khan, who promptly gets her pregnant. From then on her brief flirtations at the citadel end, and a fast downhill slide begins. She expects emotional resonance from her secret lover, he conveniently replaces her with his latest passion. Ranaut hits the mental asylum, while Chopra sniffs some white powder, and ends up in a seedy hotel with a strange unknown foreigner in dark skin. It is Fashion’s most deadly moment, as a drug-blown Chopra desperately uses tissue paper to wipe out her dark circles.

Kangana Ranaut is brilliantly cast and has potent screen presence as a sad basket case headed for certain self-destruction. Mughda Godse as a little-known model but Chopra’s enduring confidante in a self-centric space is endearing. Bhandarkar gets terrific performances from all minor role-players such as Harsh Chayya ( as the lisping gay bespectacled designer), Kitu Gidwani ( model coordinator), Samir Soni, Arjan Bawa ( as Priyanka’s first cosmopolitan crush) and Arbaaz Khan , as the Machiavellian “player”. The fashion shows are imaginatively captured, the back-room operations seething with chaotic frenzy amidst the lipstick, accessories , bruised egos, wild ambitions, and rising smoke. Bhandarkar directs the film, without over-doing skin-show or excessive emotional melodrama, revealing quite expertly the grime behind the gloss, in a well-crafted women’s film.

Bhandarkar ends the movie, despite it’s constant oppressive gloominess, on a Parisian high. As Priyanka Chopra sashays down the international ramp looking a stunning diva, she manifests hope, resilience and survival. It is a performance of a lifetime, and Chopra after this is no longer just Don’s candy-floss or Drona’s arm-candy. It is her moment in the sun. And also the flash-bulbs. Just like Meghana Mathur in Fashion.

A star is born.

18
Jun
09

21 AND COUNTING!

Movie: 21

Rating: 3.75/5

What happens if you are a mathematical genius scoring outstanding grades, graduating from MIT, Boston , and have received admission in the neighboring prestigious Harvard Medical School only to find out that you are financially broke? That it costs a whopping $ 300,000 to bankroll admissions, and no educational loans are available? . The lone surviving parent has steadily accumulated her whole life earnings of $ 68,000, but even that is a tiny fraction . There is a slender hope though amidst the appalling gloom, says the HMS Dean. “ There is one scholarship available which can fund the whole study, but there are at least 25 other equally brilliant claimants, Mr Ben Campbell”.

Ben ( played with outstanding restrained maturity by young Jim Sturgess) looks helplessly on and then makes an earnest plea; Sir, I need the scholarship”. The Dean ( why is this academic animal usually so steely and surly universally, is a foxy mystery to me ) looks impassively on, and then throws him a daunting challenge;” Tell me a story, son. A life experience, something personal, something deep. And the scholarship is yours. But you have to leave me dazzled”. “ But I have done nothing so far, Sir. I have no experience, Sir, worth talking about”, pleads Ben plaintively. Thus far, yes.

Guided by their mercurial stats professor ( Kevin Spacey, one of my all-time favorites after that classic American Beauty act) , naturally calculating , a group of five smart whizkids come together to secretly specialize in the art of “ card-counting”. Ben is charmed and cajoled into joining this quixotic gang. Card-counting, a mental memory skill can help predict the next cards on the deck in that casino favorite ; blackjack. Obviously, millions remain to be won. So it’s destination sin city, Las Vegas. While for the rest it is easy week-end debauchery in glitzy five-star comforts, Ben , who becomes the key player, wants to save up for Harvard Med. Only he is completely clueless that someone is watching over them.

21 is engrossing fare, more so because it is based on a true-life story. It’s most poignant moment comes when Ben lies to his mother about his financial windfall. The script is young and peppy and full of sophomore sauce. Spacey is awesome ( as usual) as the astute schemer who finds himself isolated amongst his own pupils.

In the last scene, as Ben recollects his bizarre tale, he queries the disbelieving Dean;” Are you dazzled enough, now Sir?”.

You sure will be. And also discover , like Ben, what they do not teach you at Harvard Medical school.

18
Jun
09

YOU DON”T MESS WITH THE ZOHAN

Rating: 3.25/5

This movie has an inauspicious beginning; it starts with a widescreen shot of Adam Sandler’s McDonald’s hamburger-shaped bum . Sandler ( Zohan) , for whom playing the buffoon is like slipping into second skin, is part of some Israeli spy force ( god bless the Mossad!) and is a cult hero , like Rambo. He performs pyrotechnics, straight out of Gemini circus, but it is effective thanks to nincompoop opponents. Naturally, the Arabs want him in a kebab roll.

Sandler has a peculiar fetish however , he wants to be a Park Avenue, New York hair stylist instead of doing military drills and playing basketball with small grenades. Following an underwater free-for-all with his Middle-Eastern counterpart , where Sandler’s swimming trunks bulge when a nasty piranha jumps into them , Sandler misleads the world into believing that he is now dead man floating. Then he does a self-scissor act, which converts him from a George Harrison look-alike into Adam Sandler with a French beard, and lands in Manhattan. What follows is sheer ludicrousness.

Sandler , who even brushes teeth with humus, manages to get a job with a down and out salon owned by a PYT of Arab descent. Sandler does not just cut hair, he does some deadly hip-shaking pelvic- thrusting dances that would frankly make even Shakira feel threatened. Naturally, the women get aroused by his constantly burgeoning you-know-what , and soon he provides free “value-added services”. Overnight, a queue of over 60’s women , dentures, wig, hip transplants, and an assortment of other ailments form outside the ramshackle salon. Naturally, Zohan becomes a celebrity hair-dresser , although he is shown more busy with his “ pee-pee” ( to quote him).

The Arabs soon discover that the Israeli spy is alive, kicking ,cutting and ———-, and want Zohan in their meat-roll, with or without humus. But before long they discover that George Bush is responsible for the Arab-Israeli conflict , and there is the usual brotherhood of man and mighty hugging and ass-slapping. How you wish Palestine was in New York! Zohan lives another day to cut hair and cut loose.

As the hip-hop types would say, Zohan’s shit is in a mess. But with a lot of humus and humor too.




Archives

Calendar

March 2010
M T W T F S S
« Feb    
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  

Categories

Top Clicks

  • None

 

March 2010
M T W T F S S
« Feb    
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  

Flickr Photos

Michele 2

whiteyellowgreenblueredorangepink

翅。

More Photos
Watch videos at Vodpod and other videos from this collection.

Sanjay Jha on Twitter

  • I guess it is a business deal, promote the book and get the author to do a chat on the site. And I fought against the fraud who sells crap. 1 hour ago
  • A tragedy that my co- owners of CricketNext.com have sold their soul and carried a Harper Collins press release on Fake IPL Players book.. 1 hour ago
  • The whole old cricketnext.com team hangs it's head in shame and repugnance. In the world of IPL, as long as it sells, it is ok. 5 hours ago
  • My suggestion to all passionate entrepreneurs, when you sell a stake, look for quality partners with commitment, sincerity and ethics. 5 hours ago
  • My co-owners with majority control are promoting the sensationalistic behind the room gossip-monger on our Home Page. 5 hours ago

Heard That ?

A politician has a straightforward way of dodging issues.
More

Wisecrack of the Week

A Politician: he is full of promises that go in one year and out the other
More